Digg
Google Buzz
LinkedIn
Stumbleupon
Delicious
India - Household Consumer Expenditure: 66th Round, Schedule 1.0_T1, July 2009 - June 2010 (Type-1)
| Reference ID | DDI-IND-NSSO-66-SCHEDULE-1.0T1 |
| Year | 2009 - 2010 |
| Country | India |
| Producer(s) | National Sample Survey Office,NSSO |
| Sponsor(s) | Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation, Govenment of Indis - MOSPI - |
| Collection(s) | |
| Metadata |
 Documentation in PDF
|
Created on
Aug 04, 2016
Last modified
Sep 02, 2016
Page views
1401448
- Identification of Sa
mple Household - Household Characteri
stics - Demographic and othe
r particulars of hou
sehold members - Consumption of cerea
ls, pulses, milk and
milk products, suga
r and salt during th
e last 30 days - Consumption of cloth
ing, bedding and foo
twear during last 30
and 365 days - Expenditure on educa
tion and medical (in
stitutional) goods a
nd services - Expenditure on misce
llaneous goods and s
ervices including me
dical (non-instituti
onal), rents and tax
es during the last 3
0 days - Expenditure for purc
hase and constructio
n (including repair
and maintenance) of
durable goods for do
mestic use - Summary of comsumer
expenditure
Variable Groups
Stratum
(Stratum)
File: Consumption of clothing, bedding and footwear during last 30 and 365 days
File: Consumption of clothing, bedding and footwear during last 30 and 365 days
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 2 | Valid cases: 1210249 Invalid: 0 |
Definition
Within each district of a State/ UT, generally speaking, two basic strata is formed: i) rural stratum comprising of all rural areas of the district and (ii) urban stratum comprising of all the urban areas of the district. However, within the urban areas of a district, if there are one or more towns with population 10 lakhs or more as per population census 2001 in a district, each of them is form a separate basic stratum and the remaining urban areas of the district considered as another basic stratum.
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 72316 |  6.0%
| |
| 02 | 68627 | 5.7%
| |
| 03 | 58349 | 4.8%
| |
| 04 | 64776 | 5.4%
| |
| 05 | 46594 | 3.8%
| |
| 06 | 62709 | 5.2%
| |
| 07 | 47426 | 3.9%
| |
| 08 | 39124 | 3.2%
| |
| 09 | 43656 | 3.6%
| |
| 10 | 48564 | 4.0%
| |
| 11 | 44939 | 3.7%
| |
| 12 | 41875 | 3.5%
| |
| 13 | 48156 | 4.0%
| |
| 14 | 39999 | 3.3%
| |
| 15 | 32925 | 2.7%
| |
| 16 | 27132 | 2.2%
| |
| 17 | 23617 | 2.0%
| |
| 18 | 29196 | 2.4%
| |
| 19 | 29932 | 2.5%
| |
| 20 | 23708 | 2.0%
| |
| 21 | 31420 | 2.6%
| |
| 22 | 17279 | 1.4%
| |
| 23 | 15164 | 1.3%
| |
| 24 | 20983 | 1.7%
| |
| 25 | 13706 | 1.1%
| |
| 26 | 19593 | 1.6%
| |
| 27 | 14169 | 1.2%
| |
| 28 | 18146 | 1.5%
| |
| 29 | 11745 | 1.0%
| |
| 30 | 12476 | 1.0%
| |
| 31 | 9035 | 0.7%
| |
| 32 | 10742 | 0.9%
| |
| 33 | 7516 | 0.6%
| |
| 34 | 6930 | 0.6%
| |
| 35 | 6561 | 0.5%
| |
| 36 | 6110 | 0.5%
| |
| 37 | 4616 | 0.4%
| |
| 38 | 5046 | 0.4%
| |
| 39 | 5552 | 0.5%
| |
| 40 | 10670 | 0.9%
| |
| 41 | 2978 | 0.2%
| |
| 42 | 5261 | 0.4%
| |
| 43 | 3636 | 0.3%
| |
| 44 | 2615 | 0.2%
| |
| 45 | 3588 | 0.3%
| |
| 46 | 2680 | 0.2%
| |
| 47 | 1882 | 0.2%
| |
| 48 | 1791 | 0.1%
| |
| 49 | 2886 | 0.2%
| |
| 50 | 2210 | 0.2%
| |
| 51 | 1166 | 0.1%
| |
| 52 | 1143 | 0.1%
| |
| 53 | 1961 | 0.2%
| |
| 54 | 1193 | 0.1%
| |
| 55 | 1188 | 0.1%
| |
| 56 | 1240 | 0.1%
| |
| 57 | 1219 | 0.1%
| |
| 58 | 2382 | 0.2%
| |
| 59 | 2017 | 0.2%
| |
| 60 | 2078 | 0.2%
| |
| 61 | 2237 | 0.2%
| |
| 62 | 1387 | 0.1%
| |
| 63 | 2246 | 0.2%
| |
| 64 | 2095 | 0.2%
| |
| 65 | 1975 | 0.2%
| |
| 66 | 994 | 0.1%
| |
| 67 | 1072 | 0.1%
| |
| 68 | 1020 | 0.1%
| |
| 69 | 1099 | 0.1%
| |
| 70 | 1027 | 0.1%
| |
| 71 | 734 | 0.1%
| |
| 72 | 945 | 0.1%
| |
| 73 | 997 | 0.1%
| |
| 74 | 1166 | 0.1%
| |
| 75 | 719 | 0.1%
| |
| 99 | 4343 | 0.4%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.