Digg
Google Buzz
LinkedIn
Stumbleupon
Delicious
India - Household Consumer Expenditure: 66th Round, Schedule 1.0_T1, July 2009 - June 2010 (Type-1)
| Reference ID | DDI-IND-NSSO-66-SCHEDULE-1.0T1 |
| Year | 2009 - 2010 |
| Country | India |
| Producer(s) | National Sample Survey Office,NSSO |
| Sponsor(s) | Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation, Govenment of Indis - MOSPI - |
| Collection(s) | |
| Metadata |
 Documentation in PDF
|
Created on
Aug 04, 2016
Last modified
Sep 02, 2016
Page views
1401572
- Identification of Sa
mple Household - Household Characteri
stics - Demographic and othe
r particulars of hou
sehold members - Consumption of cerea
ls, pulses, milk and
milk products, suga
r and salt during th
e last 30 days - Consumption of cloth
ing, bedding and foo
twear during last 30
and 365 days - Expenditure on educa
tion and medical (in
stitutional) goods a
nd services - Expenditure on misce
llaneous goods and s
ervices including me
dical (non-instituti
onal), rents and tax
es during the last 3
0 days - Expenditure for purc
hase and constructio
n (including repair
and maintenance) of
durable goods for do
mestic use - Summary of comsumer
expenditure
Variable Groups
Stratum
(Stratum)
File: Demographic and other particulars of household members
File: Demographic and other particulars of household members
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 2 | Valid cases: 468551 Invalid: 0 |
Definition
Within each district of a State/ UT, generally speaking, two basic strata is formed: i) rural stratum comprising of all rural areas of the district and (ii) urban stratum comprising of all the urban areas of the district. However, within the urban areas of a district, if there are one or more towns with population 10 lakhs or more as per population census 2001 in a district, each of them is form a separate basic stratum and the remaining urban areas of the district considered as another basic stratum.
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 27174 |  5.8%
| |
| 02 | 25023 | 5.3%
| |
| 03 | 23102 | 4.9%
| |
| 04 | 24712 | 5.3%
| |
| 05 | 19097 | 4.1%
| |
| 06 | 24277 | 5.2%
| |
| 07 | 19297 | 4.1%
| |
| 08 | 15587 | 3.3%
| |
| 09 | 16564 | 3.5%
| |
| 10 | 17348 | 3.7%
| |
| 11 | 16800 | 3.6%
| |
| 12 | 15416 | 3.3%
| |
| 13 | 17822 | 3.8%
| |
| 14 | 15050 | 3.2%
| |
| 15 | 12264 | 2.6%
| |
| 16 | 10445 | 2.2%
| |
| 17 | 9745 | 2.1%
| |
| 18 | 11304 | 2.4%
| |
| 19 | 11594 | 2.5%
| |
| 20 | 9472 | 2.0%
| |
| 21 | 11637 | 2.5%
| |
| 22 | 6636 | 1.4%
| |
| 23 | 6219 | 1.3%
| |
| 24 | 7905 | 1.7%
| |
| 25 | 5282 | 1.1%
| |
| 26 | 7225 | 1.5%
| |
| 27 | 5807 | 1.2%
| |
| 28 | 7228 | 1.5%
| |
| 29 | 4569 | 1.0%
| |
| 30 | 4930 | 1.1%
| |
| 31 | 3617 | 0.8%
| |
| 32 | 3943 | 0.8%
| |
| 33 | 3122 | 0.7%
| |
| 34 | 2811 | 0.6%
| |
| 35 | 2794 | 0.6%
| |
| 36 | 2448 | 0.5%
| |
| 37 | 1955 | 0.4%
| |
| 38 | 1786 | 0.4%
| |
| 39 | 1939 | 0.4%
| |
| 40 | 3818 | 0.8%
| |
| 41 | 1167 | 0.2%
| |
| 42 | 1890 | 0.4%
| |
| 43 | 1625 | 0.3%
| |
| 44 | 1047 | 0.2%
| |
| 45 | 1689 | 0.4%
| |
| 46 | 1109 | 0.2%
| |
| 47 | 920 | 0.2%
| |
| 48 | 964 | 0.2%
| |
| 49 | 1433 | 0.3%
| |
| 50 | 914 | 0.2%
| |
| 51 | 539 | 0.1%
| |
| 52 | 570 | 0.1%
| |
| 53 | 1012 | 0.2%
| |
| 54 | 561 | 0.1%
| |
| 55 | 584 | 0.1%
| |
| 56 | 598 | 0.1%
| |
| 57 | 529 | 0.1%
| |
| 58 | 1045 | 0.2%
| |
| 59 | 896 | 0.2%
| |
| 60 | 976 | 0.2%
| |
| 61 | 1036 | 0.2%
| |
| 62 | 601 | 0.1%
| |
| 63 | 939 | 0.2%
| |
| 64 | 1114 | 0.2%
| |
| 65 | 972 | 0.2%
| |
| 66 | 512 | 0.1%
| |
| 67 | 573 | 0.1%
| |
| 68 | 558 | 0.1%
| |
| 69 | 495 | 0.1%
| |
| 70 | 486 | 0.1%
| |
| 71 | 255 | 0.1%
| |
| 72 | 330 | 0.1%
| |
| 73 | 477 | 0.1%
| |
| 74 | 438 | 0.1%
| |
| 75 | 349 | 0.1%
| |
| 99 | 1584 | 0.3%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.