India - Survey on Maternity, Child Care, Family Planning and Utilisation of Public Distribution System: NSS 42nd Round, Schedule 25.1, July 1986- June 1987
| Reference ID | DDI-IND-MOSPI-NSSO-42Rnd-Sch25dot1-1986-87 |
| Year | 0 |
| Country | India |
| Producer(s) | National Sample Survey Office |
| Sponsor(s) | M/o Statistics & Programme Implementation, GOI - MOSPI - |
| Collection(s) | |
| Metadata |
Documentation in PDF
|
Created on
Mar 10, 2016
Last modified
Mar 31, 2016
Page views
423620
- Block1-Household-ID-
records - Block31-Household-Ch
aracteristics-record
s - Block32_commodity-pu
rchased-records - Block5-demographic-p
articulars-persons-r
ecords - Block51-Immunisation
-persons-records - Block52-Anti-tetanus
-injection-details-w
omen-records - Block6-Healthcare-mo
rbidity-children-rec
ords - Block7-Pre-post-nata
l-maternity-mother-r
ecords - Block8-Family-planni
ng-services-received
-by-couple-records - Block9-Death-persons
-records
State
(State)
File: Block9-Death-persons-records
File: Block9-Death-persons-records
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 2 | Valid cases: 2306 Invalid: 0 |
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02 | Andhra Pradesh | 104 | |
| 03 | Assam | 177 | |
| 04 | Bihar | 226 | |
| 05 | Gujarat | 87 | |
| 06 | Haryana | 23 | |
| 07 | Himachal Pradesh | 32 | |
| 08 | Jammu & Kashmir | 68 | |
| 09 | Karnataka | 86 | |
| 10 | Kerala | 46 | |
| 11 | Madhya Pradesh | 194 | |
| 12 | Maharashtra | 152 | |
| 13 | Manipur | 10 | |
| 14 | Meghalaya | 32 | |
| 15 | Nagaland | 1 | |
| 16 | Orissa | 84 | |
| 17 | Punjab | 59 | |
| 18 | Rajasthan | 145 | |
| 19 | Sikkim | 6 | |
| 20 | Tamil Nadu | 147 | |
| 21 | Tripura | 34 | |
| 22 | Uttar Pradesh | 391 | |
| 23 | West Bengal | 144 | |
| 24 | A & N Islands | 12 | |
| 25 | Arunachal Pradesh | 0 | |
| 26 | Chandigarh | 2 | |
| 27 | Dadra & Nagar Haveli | 0 | |
| 28 | Delhi | 18 | |
| 29 | Goa | 5 | |
| 30 | Lakshdweep | 4 | |
| 31 | Mizoram | 12 | |
| 32 | Pondicherry | 5 |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.



Documentation in PDF